Review: Veeam Backup & Replication 3.1

Part 2 of my backup products review has been released at SearchVMware.com. Follow the link below to see my review on “Veeam Backup & Replication 3.1”.

Backup and replication product review directory

I. Introduction
II. Veeam Backup and Replication 3.1 | Veeam responds
III. Vizioncore vRanger Pro 4 Data Protection Platform | Vizioncore responds(Coming soon)
IV. esXpress 3.6 VMware Backup | esXpress responds (Coming soon)
V. VMware Data Recovery 1.0 | VMware responds (Coming soon)
VI. Conclusions (Coming soon)

8 thoughts on “Review: Veeam Backup & Replication 3.1

  1. Veaam Backup & Replication 4.0 is available and vRanger Pro 4.2 DPP will be released in November.
    I hope you'll try those version for an up-to-date review.

  2. Veaam Backup & Replication 4.0 is available and vRanger Pro 4.2 DPP will be released in November.
    I hope you'll try those version for an up-to-date review.

  3. Been reading the reviews with interest as ~I am looking to do something similar myself, currently evaulating Veeam, Vizioncore and esXpress. Firstly like the PHD (EsXpress) idea, helper vbas and simultaneous streams speed things up a lot, not needed in my environment as it is quite small, but nevertheless it would scale if needed. Unforgiveable is the restore mechanism, copying zip files around doesn't fly in 2009 and they need to work on this. If they get it, market leadership is a definite. Veeam vs Vizioncore is on the face of it quite close, however Vizioncore can successfully back up and restore to dynamic disks which Veeam cannot, again in 2009…. Enjoying Gabrie's reviews, one point of note though VSS in the VM Backp space is not Visual Sourcesafe but rather the Volume Shadow copy Service. Look forward to reading the other reviews!

  4. Been reading the reviews with interest as ~I am looking to do something similar myself, currently evaulating Veeam, Vizioncore and esXpress. Firstly like the PHD (EsXpress) idea, helper vbas and simultaneous streams speed things up a lot, not needed in my environment as it is quite small, but nevertheless it would scale if needed. Unforgiveable is the restore mechanism, copying zip files around doesn't fly in 2009 and they need to work on this. If they get it, market leadership is a definite. Veeam vs Vizioncore is on the face of it quite close, however Vizioncore can successfully back up and restore to dynamic disks which Veeam cannot, again in 2009…. Enjoying Gabrie's reviews, one point of note though VSS in the VM Backp space is not Visual Sourcesafe but rather the Volume Shadow copy Service. Look forward to reading the other reviews!

Comments are closed.